<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Wage Deductions: Salon Owners Charging Employees For Product	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html</link>
	<description>Backstabbing, bitchfits, and Botox...there&#039;s no business like the beauty business.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2020 21:25:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tina Alberino		</title>
		<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tina Alberino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 22:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localthisuglybeautybusiness.com/?p=223#comment-34833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34757&quot;&gt;MSF&lt;/a&gt;.

The way fees are being deducted from the gross sale before your commission is calculated would be considered legal so long as your employer classifies you properly (as an employee--which means they&#039;re also deducting and paying employment taxes) and they&#039;re meeting or exceeding the prevailing minimum wage in your area. If they are doing neither, the problem isn&#039;t necessarily the costs they account for before calculating your pay, but the fact that they&#039;re not in compliance with prevailing wage legislation and are therefore committing wage theft. Often, when I see that someone is &quot;on commission,&quot; that&#039;s code for &lt;a href=&quot;https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2017/01/know-your-rights-in-salon-employee.html&quot;&gt;&quot;commission-only,&quot; which isn&#039;t legal.&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34757">MSF</a>.</p>
<p>The way fees are being deducted from the gross sale before your commission is calculated would be considered legal so long as your employer classifies you properly (as an employee&#8211;which means they&#8217;re also deducting and paying employment taxes) and they&#8217;re meeting or exceeding the prevailing minimum wage in your area. If they are doing neither, the problem isn&#8217;t necessarily the costs they account for before calculating your pay, but the fact that they&#8217;re not in compliance with prevailing wage legislation and are therefore committing wage theft. Often, when I see that someone is &#8220;on commission,&#8221; that&#8217;s code for <a href="https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2017/01/know-your-rights-in-salon-employee.html">&#8220;commission-only,&#8221; which isn&#8217;t legal.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MSF		</title>
		<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34757</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MSF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:07:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localthisuglybeautybusiness.com/?p=223#comment-34757</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Tina, I feel like you get asked the same questions over again and I apologize if I missed this answer. In Ohio, and I could not find it anywhere from the link in any wage deductions,  are product costs legal for commission and not booth renters? As I was reading your answers to some of the other questions, it seems like it was. I have worked both commission and booth rent and am currently commission. Product fees are being taken off each service before my percentage, BUT I just recently started getting itemized pay stubs showing exactly what was being paid out. Hundreds of dollars and when I asked about it, I was told that I don&#039;t  really realize how much goes into marketing and everyone else&#039;s hourly jobs. There are 4 of us that work commission, and maybe 6 on hourly. 
I then stated that&#039;s a business expense, not mine, and was blown off. We are due for a staff meeting to discuss a new pay system, I stated I want a receipt for my product cost to deduct from my taxes, if I can even do that. I just need to make a stand. But I first need to know if I am right or wrong. I appreciate this blog so much. Every article is so helpful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Tina, I feel like you get asked the same questions over again and I apologize if I missed this answer. In Ohio, and I could not find it anywhere from the link in any wage deductions,  are product costs legal for commission and not booth renters? As I was reading your answers to some of the other questions, it seems like it was. I have worked both commission and booth rent and am currently commission. Product fees are being taken off each service before my percentage, BUT I just recently started getting itemized pay stubs showing exactly what was being paid out. Hundreds of dollars and when I asked about it, I was told that I don&#8217;t  really realize how much goes into marketing and everyone else&#8217;s hourly jobs. There are 4 of us that work commission, and maybe 6 on hourly.<br />
I then stated that&#8217;s a business expense, not mine, and was blown off. We are due for a staff meeting to discuss a new pay system, I stated I want a receipt for my product cost to deduct from my taxes, if I can even do that. I just need to make a stand. But I first need to know if I am right or wrong. I appreciate this blog so much. Every article is so helpful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tina Alberino		</title>
		<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tina Alberino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localthisuglybeautybusiness.com/?p=223#comment-34359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34312&quot;&gt;Monica&lt;/a&gt;.

Hey Monica! That&#039;s probably because the state of Montana doesn&#039;t restrict or prohibit wage deductions. (Or at least it didn&#039;t when I last updated this post.) It appears to now, so I&#039;ve updated the post with the link. &lt;a href=&quot;http://erd.dli.mt.gov/labor-standards/wage-and-hour-payment-act/wage-and-hour-faq&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;Here it is.&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34312">Monica</a>.</p>
<p>Hey Monica! That&#8217;s probably because the state of Montana doesn&#8217;t restrict or prohibit wage deductions. (Or at least it didn&#8217;t when I last updated this post.) It appears to now, so I&#8217;ve updated the post with the link. <a href="http://erd.dli.mt.gov/labor-standards/wage-and-hour-payment-act/wage-and-hour-faq" rel="nofollow ugc">Here it is.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Monica		</title>
		<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34312</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Monica]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Dec 2019 02:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localthisuglybeautybusiness.com/?p=223#comment-34312</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see the state of Montana????]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see the state of Montana????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tina Alberino		</title>
		<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34305</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tina Alberino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localthisuglybeautybusiness.com/?p=223#comment-34305</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34282&quot;&gt;Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

Cool. Here&#039;s what &lt;a href=&quot;https://twc.texas.gov/jobseekers/texas-payday-law#deductionsFromWages&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;the Texas Workforce Commission website&lt;/a&gt; says:

&lt;em&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Deductions from Wages&lt;/strong&gt;
To understand what wages are due and unpaid requires knowing what deductions are allowable.  Employers must get proper written authorization before making a payroll deduction.

The employer may not make deductions unless:

Ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction, such as in court-ordered child support payments
Authorized to do so by state or federal law, such as IRS withholding
Authorized in writing by the employee, and then only for a lawful purpose (authorizations may not be too general or too broad)
Deductions for out-of-pocket loans to an employee, even with an oral agreement to repay, are allowed only if the deduction is authorized in writing.

An employer who has received an income withholding order is required to withhold from wages, including any severance pay, commissions, bonuses or amounts paid in lieu of vacation time that the employee may be due under company policy or agreement.

If an employee has quit while in possession of company property and is due a final paycheck, wages may be withheld only when the employer is authorized to do so by law, required to do so by a court or has written authorization from the employee for the deduction. Otherwise, the employer would need to attempt to recoup the property by some other means, such as civil remedies (e.g., lawsuit, small claims court or police report) or make arrangements with the employee outside of a wage deduction.&lt;/em&gt;

That&#039;s what I meant by &quot;restricted.&quot; But again--irrelevant.

Also--NONE of what you copied and pasted reads as &quot;arbitrary&quot; to me, so I&#039;m not sure how I was &quot;wrong&quot; in my assessment that arbitrary deductions are unlawful. Where&#039;s your Law Degree™? Despite your &quot;Texas&quot; heading, you&#039;re quoting &lt;strong&gt;federal &lt;/strong&gt;law that pertains to specific classes of employees who receive things like board, lodging, and &quot;other facilities&quot; from their employers that may be considered income. I don&#039;t have a fancy law degree, but I did pass my Enrolled Agent exam, so I know enough to know that this legislation has less than nothing to do with what we&#039;re talking about. It&#039;s neat that you thought I&#039;d be dumb enough to mistake this for something legitimate and relevant though. You may want to continue reading that statute, specifically the part where it states:

&quot;(c) It should also be noted that under §531.3(d)(1), the cost of furnishing “facilities” which are primarily for the benefit or convenience of the employer will not be recognized as reasonable and may not therefore be included in computing wages.&quot;

I&#039;d continue to share more about how &quot;facilities&quot; are defined in 531, but &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&#038;SID=734ad98e56d5c8c62a74f9793410a067&#038;mc=true&#038;n=sp29.3.531.c&#038;r=SUBPART&#038;ty=HTML#se29.3.531_129&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow ugc&quot;&gt;I&#039;ll let you do that here&lt;/a&gt;. I&#039;ve lost interest.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34282">Anonymous</a>.</p>
<p>Cool. Here&#8217;s what <a href="https://twc.texas.gov/jobseekers/texas-payday-law#deductionsFromWages" rel="nofollow ugc">the Texas Workforce Commission website</a> says:</p>
<p><em><strong>Deductions from Wages</strong><br />
To understand what wages are due and unpaid requires knowing what deductions are allowable.  Employers must get proper written authorization before making a payroll deduction.</p>
<p>The employer may not make deductions unless:</p>
<p>Ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction, such as in court-ordered child support payments<br />
Authorized to do so by state or federal law, such as IRS withholding<br />
Authorized in writing by the employee, and then only for a lawful purpose (authorizations may not be too general or too broad)<br />
Deductions for out-of-pocket loans to an employee, even with an oral agreement to repay, are allowed only if the deduction is authorized in writing.</p>
<p>An employer who has received an income withholding order is required to withhold from wages, including any severance pay, commissions, bonuses or amounts paid in lieu of vacation time that the employee may be due under company policy or agreement.</p>
<p>If an employee has quit while in possession of company property and is due a final paycheck, wages may be withheld only when the employer is authorized to do so by law, required to do so by a court or has written authorization from the employee for the deduction. Otherwise, the employer would need to attempt to recoup the property by some other means, such as civil remedies (e.g., lawsuit, small claims court or police report) or make arrangements with the employee outside of a wage deduction.</em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s what I meant by &#8220;restricted.&#8221; But again&#8211;irrelevant.</p>
<p>Also&#8211;NONE of what you copied and pasted reads as &#8220;arbitrary&#8221; to me, so I&#8217;m not sure how I was &#8220;wrong&#8221; in my assessment that arbitrary deductions are unlawful. Where&#8217;s your Law Degree™? Despite your &#8220;Texas&#8221; heading, you&#8217;re quoting <strong>federal </strong>law that pertains to specific classes of employees who receive things like board, lodging, and &#8220;other facilities&#8221; from their employers that may be considered income. I don&#8217;t have a fancy law degree, but I did pass my Enrolled Agent exam, so I know enough to know that this legislation has less than nothing to do with what we&#8217;re talking about. It&#8217;s neat that you thought I&#8217;d be dumb enough to mistake this for something legitimate and relevant though. You may want to continue reading that statute, specifically the part where it states:</p>
<p>&#8220;(c) It should also be noted that under §531.3(d)(1), the cost of furnishing “facilities” which are primarily for the benefit or convenience of the employer will not be recognized as reasonable and may not therefore be included in computing wages.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d continue to share more about how &#8220;facilities&#8221; are defined in 531, but <a href="https://www.ecfr.gov/cgi-bin/retrieveECFR?gp=&amp;SID=734ad98e56d5c8c62a74f9793410a067&amp;mc=true&amp;n=sp29.3.531.c&amp;r=SUBPART&amp;ty=HTML#se29.3.531_129" rel="nofollow ugc">I&#8217;ll let you do that here</a>. I&#8217;ve lost interest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tina Alberino		</title>
		<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34302</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tina Alberino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localthisuglybeautybusiness.com/?p=223#comment-34302</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34283&quot;&gt;Paul&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh, I see. You left a bunch of uninformed, catty comments under a fake email address without comprehending how comment moderation systems work and then got pissy when you didn&#039;t immediately see your comments. LOL, cool.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34283">Paul</a>.</p>
<p>Oh, I see. You left a bunch of uninformed, catty comments under a fake email address without comprehending how comment moderation systems work and then got pissy when you didn&#8217;t immediately see your comments. LOL, cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tina Alberino		</title>
		<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34301</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tina Alberino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localthisuglybeautybusiness.com/?p=223#comment-34301</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34281&quot;&gt;Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

You should re-read that post there, bud. I never said it was &quot;illegal.&quot; If you refer back to what I wrote, it says, &quot;I have composed a list of states that &lt;strong&gt;restrict or outright prohibit&lt;/strong&gt; arbitrary wage deductions below and linked the relevant statues.&quot;

If you search the page for &quot;Texas&quot; you&#039;ll see there are already some comments about the issue there and how they handle it, but that&#039;s all irrelevant because you apparently didn&#039;t read or understand the first part of the article to begin with, which states, &quot;“Is it legal for my boss to take product fees &lt;strong&gt;from my paycheck&lt;/strong&gt;? In the vast majority of states, arbitrary deductions &lt;strong&gt;from paychecks&lt;/strong&gt; (even if you’ve authorized them by written agreement) are NOT permissible.&quot;

You&#039;re talking about a legal compensation structure that takes COGS from the gross sale--not from &lt;strong&gt;the employee&#039;s wages&lt;/strong&gt;. You don&#039;t need a &quot;Law Degree&quot; to understand the difference.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34281">Anonymous</a>.</p>
<p>You should re-read that post there, bud. I never said it was &#8220;illegal.&#8221; If you refer back to what I wrote, it says, &#8220;I have composed a list of states that <strong>restrict or outright prohibit</strong> arbitrary wage deductions below and linked the relevant statues.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you search the page for &#8220;Texas&#8221; you&#8217;ll see there are already some comments about the issue there and how they handle it, but that&#8217;s all irrelevant because you apparently didn&#8217;t read or understand the first part of the article to begin with, which states, &#8220;“Is it legal for my boss to take product fees <strong>from my paycheck</strong>? In the vast majority of states, arbitrary deductions <strong>from paychecks</strong> (even if you’ve authorized them by written agreement) are NOT permissible.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re talking about a legal compensation structure that takes COGS from the gross sale&#8211;not from <strong>the employee&#8217;s wages</strong>. You don&#8217;t need a &#8220;Law Degree&#8221; to understand the difference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tina Alberino		</title>
		<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34299</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tina Alberino]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 17:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localthisuglybeautybusiness.com/?p=223#comment-34299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34283&quot;&gt;Paul&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m almost 100% sure this is spam, but because it&#039;s a new variety of spam I&#039;ve never encountered before, I&#039;ll play along.

Lulwut?

In all the years I&#039;ve been writing this blog, I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve ever deleted a post. I&#039;ve certainly edited a few articles once circumstances or my opinions have changed, but I don&#039;t remove the prior content. I strike it through and write [UPDATE-2019] etc.

Deleting posts on a site like this doesn&#039;t benefit me whatsoever (because SEO). That said, the hyperlink structures have changed, so some links may lead to broken pages. That doesn&#039;t mean the content doesn&#039;t exist, just that it&#039;s not wherever that link points anymore.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34283">Paul</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m almost 100% sure this is spam, but because it&#8217;s a new variety of spam I&#8217;ve never encountered before, I&#8217;ll play along.</p>
<p>Lulwut?</p>
<p>In all the years I&#8217;ve been writing this blog, I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve ever deleted a post. I&#8217;ve certainly edited a few articles once circumstances or my opinions have changed, but I don&#8217;t remove the prior content. I strike it through and write [UPDATE-2019] etc.</p>
<p>Deleting posts on a site like this doesn&#8217;t benefit me whatsoever (because SEO). That said, the hyperlink structures have changed, so some links may lead to broken pages. That doesn&#8217;t mean the content doesn&#8217;t exist, just that it&#8217;s not wherever that link points anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Paul		</title>
		<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34283</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 03:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localthisuglybeautybusiness.com/?p=223#comment-34283</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tina removes any posts where she is proven incorrect. Class act.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tina removes any posts where she is proven incorrect. Class act.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://thisuglybeautybusiness.com/2014/12/shady-business-practices-salon-owners-charging-staff-for-product.html#comment-34282</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 02:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.localthisuglybeautybusiness.com/?p=223#comment-34282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Texas
§ 531.33   “Reasonable cost”; “fair value.”

top
(a) Section 3(m) directs the Administrator to determine “the reasonable cost  *  *  * to the employer of furnishing  *  *  * facilities” to the employee, and in addition it authorizes him to determine “the fair value” of such facilities for defined classes of employees and in defined areas, which may be used in lieu of the actual measure of the cost of such facilities in ascertaining the “wages” paid to any employee. Subpart B contains three methods whereby an employer may ascertain whether any furnished facilities are a part of “wages” within the meaning of section 3(m): (1) An employer may calculate the “reasonable cost” of facilities in accordance with the requirements set forth in §531.3; (2) an employer may request that a determination of “reasonable cost” be made, including a determination having particular application; and (3) an employer may request that a determination of “fair value” of the furnished facilities be made to be used in lieu of the actual measure of the cost of the furnished facilities in assessing the “wages” paid to an employee.
(b) “Reasonable cost,” as determined in §531.3 “does not include a profit to the employer or to any affiliated person.” Although the question of affiliation is one of fact, where any of the following persons operate company stores or commissaries or furnish lodging or other facilities they will normally be deemed “affiliated persons” within the meaning of the regulations: (1) A spouse, child, parent, or other close relative of the employer; (2) a partner, officer, or employee in the employer company or firm; (3) a parent, subsidiary, or otherwise closely connected corporation; and (4) an agent of the employer.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Texas<br />
§ 531.33   “Reasonable cost”; “fair value.”</p>
<p>top<br />
(a) Section 3(m) directs the Administrator to determine “the reasonable cost  *  *  * to the employer of furnishing  *  *  * facilities” to the employee, and in addition it authorizes him to determine “the fair value” of such facilities for defined classes of employees and in defined areas, which may be used in lieu of the actual measure of the cost of such facilities in ascertaining the “wages” paid to any employee. Subpart B contains three methods whereby an employer may ascertain whether any furnished facilities are a part of “wages” within the meaning of section 3(m): (1) An employer may calculate the “reasonable cost” of facilities in accordance with the requirements set forth in §531.3; (2) an employer may request that a determination of “reasonable cost” be made, including a determination having particular application; and (3) an employer may request that a determination of “fair value” of the furnished facilities be made to be used in lieu of the actual measure of the cost of the furnished facilities in assessing the “wages” paid to an employee.<br />
(b) “Reasonable cost,” as determined in §531.3 “does not include a profit to the employer or to any affiliated person.” Although the question of affiliation is one of fact, where any of the following persons operate company stores or commissaries or furnish lodging or other facilities they will normally be deemed “affiliated persons” within the meaning of the regulations: (1) A spouse, child, parent, or other close relative of the employer; (2) a partner, officer, or employee in the employer company or firm; (3) a parent, subsidiary, or otherwise closely connected corporation; and (4) an agent of the employer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
